Keywords
digital competencies
teaching performance
How to Cite
Abstract
This study analyzed the effects of prospective planning on the development of digital competencies in teachers, using a qualitative methodology based on the review of 50 scientific articles from repositories such as ScienceDirect, Scielo, and Scopus. This approach made it possible to identify optimal practices, challenges, and comprehensive strategies. The results show that planning which integrates normative, strategic, and operational components strengthens teachers’ technological capabilities. Furthermore, an institutional vision oriented toward strategic objectives is essential in prospective design. It is concluded that a prospective organization facilitates adaptation to technological innovations and promotes effective pedagogical practice, thus ensuring a quality educational system.
References
A. Floyd, J. Baxter, A. Morales, and R. Bari, “Leading online learning during a pandemic and beyond: Challenges and opportunities for school leaders in England,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 829–849, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1177/17411432231191171.
A. M. McCarthy, D. Maor, A. McConney, and C. Cavanaugh, “Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 100479, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479.
A. Díaz Pérez and C. A. Villafuerte Álvarez, “Planeamiento estratégico de la educación,” Comuni@cción, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 161–171, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33595/2226-1478.13.2.681.
S. Z. Jáuregui Mora and J. C. Peña Humánez, “Cultura y gestión organizacional: Aspectos cruciales en la prospectiva y planificación de las instituciones de educación superior,” Revista Redipe, vol. 12, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.36260/rbr.v12i6.1978.
E. dos Santos Perin, M. do Carmo Duarte Freitas, and T. R. Coelho, “Digital teaching competence model: Bibliometrics and literature review,” EDUR – Educação em Revista, vol. 39, Art. no. e35344, 2023, doi: 10.1590/0102-469835344t.
L. Castro-Palomino and E. Alanya Coras, “Herramientas digitales en el desempeño de los docentes: Revisión sistemática,” Horizontes Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, vol. 8, no. 32, pp. 288–299, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.33996/revistahorizontes.v8i32.723.
A. de los S. Reyna Alcántara, “Competencias digitales y desempeño docente en los colegios de Latinoamérica,” Desafíos, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25–36, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.37711/desafios.2022.13.1.367.
G. I. Bolatan, I. Golgeci, A. Arslan, E. Tatoglu, S. Zaim, and S. Gozlu, “Unlocking the relationships between strategic planning, leadership and technology transfer competence: The mediating role of strategic quality management,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 89–113, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2020-0897.
M. Pedaste, K. Kallas, and A. Baucal, “Digital competence test for learning in schools: Development of items and scales,” Computers & Education, vol. 203, Art. no. 104830, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104830.
M. Martín-Sómer, C. Casado, and G. Gómez-Pozuelo, “Utilising interactive applications as educational tools in higher education: Perspectives from teachers and students, and an analysis of academic outcomes,” Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 46, pp. 1–9, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2023.10.001.
E. Ortegón, Prospectiva y planificación en la era de la inteligencia artificial en América Latina y el Caribe: ¿Cómo salir del atrapamiento? Lima, Peru: Universidad Continental, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12394/12000.
A. Indacochea, “La prospectiva estratégica: Los nuevos métodos,” Strategia | Mercado, pp. 56–58, 2015.
L. Hollenstein and F. Vogt, “Digital education through guided pretend play,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 93, Art. no. 101945, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101945.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.