Proposal for academic evaluation at the School of Mining Engineering due to the Covid-19 effect
PDF
HTML

Keywords

evaluation
qualification
mining
pandemic

How to Cite

Feijoo Calle, E. P. (2021). Proposal for academic evaluation at the School of Mining Engineering due to the Covid-19 effect. Minerva, 2(6), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v2i6.37

Abstract

This research proposes an alternative to the academic evaluation system, in the School of Engineering in Mines, of the University of Azuay (Ecuador), due to the Covid-19 pandemic, declared in 2020 by the WHO. Initially, a system was established, in which two components are established -contribution and final-, based on a rating of 50 points. The first component, over 30 points, qualifies aspects of attendance, compliance, and performance. The final component, over 20 points, establishes an asynchronous evaluation, in which the teacher applies various assessment instruments and finally a synchronous evaluation. After two periods with this system, the research was carried out with a universe of 90 students, based on surveys, focus groups, and using matrices, boolean algebra, and sets, changes were proposed in the way of evaluating. The results are interesting and involve a pedagogical mediation, so it must be considered in the corresponding entities.

Keywords: Evaluation, qualification, mining, pandemic.

https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v2i6.37
PDF
HTML

References

Situation report-70, 2020, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Acuerdo Ministerial No. 126, publicado en el Suplemento del Registro Oficial Nº 160 de 12 de marzo de 2020, MSP, Ecuador.

Organización de la Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura y la Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y el Caribe. Sistemas educativos de América Latina en respuesta a la Covid-19: Continuidad educativa y evaluación., 17. Santiago de Chile, 2020.

E. Diez-Gutiérrez and K. Gajardo-Espinoza, “Educar y Evaluar en Tiempos de Coronavirus: la situación en España”, Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 2, junio de 2020. doi: 10.4471/remie.2020.5604.

Universidad del Azuay, Resolución 1109, Aprobación del sistema de evaluación excepcional para el período de la pandemia COVID-19, 2020.

P. Feijoo Calle and G. Román Celi, “El Trapecio lógico en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje universitario: Una propuesta metodológica”, UCT, vol. 23, no. 93, agosto de 2019.

J. Sandí Delgado and M. Cruz Alvarado, “Propuesta metodológica de enseñanza y aprendizaje para innovar la educación superior”, InterSedes, vol. 17, no. 36, noviembre de 2016. https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/isucr.v17i36.27100.

M. Sánchez. Diseño de medios y recursos didácticos. México: Limusa, 2016.

F. Ciampolini. Didáctica Breve y Didáctica Global. Ecuador: Cooperazione Internazionale, 1991.

M. Sánchez and A. Martínez. Evaluación del y para el aprendizaje: instrumentos y estrategias. México: UNAM, 2020.

R. Grimaldi. Matemáticas Discreta y Combinatoria. México: Prentice Hall, 1998.

R. Johnsonbaugh. Matemáticas Discretas. México: Prentice Hall, 1997.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.